• bus_factor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    That’s still worse than just having a door. The squeegee helps, but it’s not perfect, and I hate stepping on wet/damp floor after drying my feet. I mostly see that style in hotels or bathrooms which are too tiny to fit a proper shower. Whenever not space constrained, I’m pretty sure they’re just there to save money.

    Building code in most if not all of northern Europe require bathrooms to be a proper wet room, meaning waterproofing and a drain for all parts of the bathroom. This means either having two drains, or to allow water to flow from the rest of the bathroom to the shower. Guess which alternative is easier and cheaper to do?

      • bus_factor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I haven’t checked the code in every country, but I do know it’s code in Norway, and you see a lot of the same building techniques in the rest of northern Europe.

        Why do you think it is not code?

        • diablicja@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’m not saying it’s not code, I know it’s code. And it’s code because they’re all doing the open shower thing. Why else would they want the whole room waterproofed if not because the whole room routinely gets wet?

          • bus_factor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            It’s still code if your shower has a door. It’s not unusual to stick your washing machine in the bathroom, and even if you don’t, the toilet could always overflow.

            North America is really the only place I know of where bathrooms are not required to be waterproofed throughout.

            • diablicja@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Yeah, I’m saying they made it code because the doorless showers are the standard, not that putting door there would somehow invalidate the code.

              I come from another European country and the law only requires waterproofing the floor + wet areas (shower, around the bath etc.)

              • bus_factor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                And I’m saying the code is there independently of doorless showers. The code was like that before doorless showers became common.

                In fact, if your shower has a door and the only drain is inside the shower, you are required to leave a gap under the door to allow water to flow into the shower.

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I’ve got a staff shower at work with no door or curtain, and two drains. It’s in a one person bathroom, with a toilet and sink and place to hang up items.

      If anyone takes a shower, there is water all over the floor for the next person… because without a door, the water doesn’t stay in the shower zone.