For all of the confusion about where the Ottawa-Washington meltdown will lead, one thing seems certain. The big winners of this diplomatic collapse will be China and other repressive dictatorships eager to become our new “strategic” partners and further undermine the world’s stabilizing democracy bloc.
Opinion piece by Charles Burton, former diplomat at Canada’s embassy in Beijing, senior fellow at Sinopsis.cz, a China-focused think tank based in Prague, Czech Republic. He is and author of ‘The Beaver and the Dragon: How China Out-Manoeuvred Canada’s Diplomacy, Security and Sovereignty’.
…
Beijing in particular wants to inherit Canada’s economic dependence. Establishing such a broader North American beachhead will only further President Xi Jinping’s resolute goal of displacing the U.S. as a global hegemon, and cementing a China-dominated world order whose very foundation is the rejection of democratic freedoms and human rights.
…
If Canada ever reaches a point where attacks on our economy put families’ livelihoods at stake, then standing firm on our moral principles will give way to tolerating – or at least ignoring – human rights abuses in exchange for restoring Canadian prosperity through trade and investment with the likes of Qatar, Saudi Arabia and China. As someone who has been sanctioned by both Beijing and Moscow for standing up for Canadian democratic and civil values in global affairs, this prospect is deeply troubling.
…
When Mr. Xi makes a landmark trip to North America next month, it is expected he will add a Canadian stop, the first time in 16 years a Chinese head of state has visited this country. And this at a time when there have been calls for Ottawa to scrap restrictions on importing Chinese-made EVs, to locate Chinese auto factories here, and to even encourage Canadians to buy “Great Wall wine” instead of Californian.
In contrast to the belligerent threats that Canadians have been conditioned to expect from Washington, the Chinese President will project dignity and a tone of respect and goodwill toward Prime Minister Mark Carney and his Canadian business associates, who will be offering a warm welcome to the Chinese delegation.
But like Howitt’s “Spider and the Fly,” in which a cunning spider uses seduction and manipulation to lure a fly into its web, Canada should be wary of those who wield flattery and charm to disguise other intentions. Rushing to embrace China’s expansionist and calculating totalitarian regime will never work out well for Canada’s overall interest.
In the current hostile landscape, Canada could find itself deeply regretting coming out of an American frying pan into a Chinese fire.
…



How is that racist? Are you like a malfunctioning AI or something?
And yes. 90+% support in a country is bad data. That doesn’t pass the smell test even a little bit. I’ve lived in countries with official approval ratings greater than 90%, I do in fact know better.
You don’t understand why excluding your chinese coworkers opinions from a survey is racist? You stupid, bro?
Right, it’s bad data, they couldn’t possibly just be happy with the results of their government, 👍.
Huh, turns out basic statistical concepts are racist. Lol. No, when every single Chinese worker replies 100% satisfaction on every survey, that data is useless. There is no point collecting that data.
Donald Trump officially claims that 95% of Americans support him. Maybe your chart isn’t true, because it doesn’t show 95% support.
Soviet union also had some pretty high approval ratings, I recall. I wonder how that’s going?
… Yeah when you disregard a certain populations data because you don’t like what it does to the data, that is definitely racism, lmao. Thank you for clarifying that you are indeed, stupid.
Do you think a statement by a Deranged pedophile war criminal is the same as a comprehensive multi year study?
Thanks for clarifying again, I suppose.
Why don’t you look up what happened to quality of life or happiness after Russia switched to capitalism and get back to me, lmao.
Do you know what a P test is? Go look that up.
Do you know what trap questions are? Go look those up too.
Your comprehensive multi year survey is at least believable, because the only claims it makes it an increase in happiness about the government. It does not claim 90+% support like your bullshit chart above.
What relevant does quality of life have to people lying on surveys?