As Musk’s SpaceX, Bezos’ Blue Origin, and other companies expand into space, they risk causing more problems for Earth in the process: air pollution, climate effects, and light pollution. The practice of downplaying these negative consequences while trumpeting the message that space operations can make life better on Earth has a new name: “starwashing,” a term the space researcher Melissa E. Yingling helped popularize in an article published in The Conversation earlier this month.

It’s a play on the term “greenwashing,” used to critique companies that highlight small sustainable investments to divert attention from the pollution their businesses cause. Space companies are appealing to a sense of “cosmic wonder” and making promises to benefit humankind, along with promoting their environmental bona fides, Yingling wrote.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    trumpeting the message that space operations can make life better on Earth

    Is anybody here who’s life has been made better by Musk?

    • Dave.@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Australia and NZ have country wide coverage for SMS via starlink.

      Australia is a huge landmass , and being able to send/receive messages just by having a view of the sky is quite significant for emergency situations.

      Here is a map showing phone coverage in Australia from all providers. There’s about 5 million square kilometres with no service at all, that now has basic communications via starlink.

      Mobile phone coverage in Australia

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      He has inarguably been a net benefit to the world. However that net benefit is decreasing rapidly every second his head remains attached to his shoulders.

      • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        He has inarguably been a net benefit to the world.

        Never heard such bs.

        One person who has grabbed that much money for himself alone is obviously a giant net loss to everybody else!

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think without him and tesla (especially the supercharger network), the EV market would be significantly behind where it is now. Granted that isn’t anything to do with space, just answering your question as written.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          The biggest problem with Starlink is that most people who have it should really have access to fiber. Starlink just really exposes the shortcomings of our terribly handled infrastructure. Of course satellite internet servers other purposes too but it really annoys me how otherwise fairly developed places have so shitty internet that they need freaking satellite to get a more reliable connection. It would be far cheaper for everyone to just massively expand fiber like everywhere in the European Union for example.

          Of course there are also the SpaceX launch sites that devastate communities and environments in ways that are absolutely unacceptable but I digress.