• SirSmoothAES@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Not thrilled about this development tbh. It only highlights how replaceable workers are. That’s not a positive story.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      My main concern with stuff like this is that our economic and social development is lagging behind technical development. If we had something resembling world-wide socialism, I’d cheer for our robotic replacements all day long.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s only true under capitalism where people are forced to work for the sake of working. Under socialism, automation should be celebrated as it frees up people from drudgery.

      • SirSmoothAES@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Automation doesn’t automatically translate to more stable worker conditions under any system, but yes, socialism is better equiped to deal with automation than capitalism. That’s where I would agree.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Not only is socialism better equipped to deal with automation, but automation is generally seen as the development path towards communism.