• geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Munition isn’t actually that expensive. As long as the munition is (a lot) cheaper than the drone, the math checks out.

    Now let me tell you about the cost to build a giant laser with a limited range…

    • freagle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      No no I understand that building the platform is expensive. That’s not in question. What’s in question is whether an expensive platform with very low price per shot eventually makes up for the platform cost.

      Likely it is intended to be used in concert with ballistics, not instead of. Laser have a very low peak rate of fire relative to ballistics, but have a very high duration of continuous field service relative to ballistics

      • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Not to mention lasers move at the speed of light. That’s got to be a benefit, right? Is there no benefit realized from the boost there?

        • freagle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I think there is benefit there but not from a time-to-kill (since the laser kills via heat accumulation which takes some measurable time) but rather that it can be more responsive to evasive maneuvers from the target