Chris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · 2 days agoFlock is canceled—and its competitors are profitingwww.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1193
arrow-up1193external-linkFlock is canceled—and its competitors are profitingwww.motherjones.comChris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · 2 days agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squareVodulas [they/them]@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-224 hours agoConsidering the ridiculous amount of stalking from cops using these cameras, no, I don’t think people would be OK with only local cops having access
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up2·23 hours agoThey should have to get a warrant, because of the fourth amendment.
minus-squareVodulas [they/them]@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·22 hours agoShould, yes, but they won’t. Cops in the US are some of the most corrupt people. The simpler and safer solution is to not have the cameras at all. Mass surveillance is never the answer
Considering the ridiculous amount of stalking from cops using these cameras, no, I don’t think people would be OK with only local cops having access
They should have to get a warrant, because of the fourth amendment.
Should, yes, but they won’t. Cops in the US are some of the most corrupt people. The simpler and safer solution is to not have the cameras at all. Mass surveillance is never the answer