I feel proponents of any programming language put a lot of spin around what isolated aspects it is good for, but fail to illustrate what a programmer in even one target domain gains from using it.

Are there programming language implementations unlike what is described above, that you feel back up their marketing?

  • flatbield@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    You generally do no write Python for speed though generally the apeed is good enough. You write it for minimal effort of coding plus libraries. Why do people use Matlab ҄and R, same.

    • Life is Tetris@leminal.spaceOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe you are replying to the other comments, but what I am getting is Python is good glue and doesn’t get in the way. That is fine, but not getting in the way is little help with any of the programming.

      • flatbield@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Python as glue is absolutely a use. The big advantage of Python is that it also has a broad range of use and expands what a single developer can do in cases where time and cost of development is more important then code efficiencey and long term support. Basically quick often throwaway apps to get something done.

        Edit: Python is a good alternative to say tcl, perl, R, matlab, VB, etc.

        • Life is Tetris@leminal.spaceOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          broad range of use, alternative to Perl, R, etc.

          Of course. Its in the same category as Ruby and Lua. Hence the question on “getting out of the way”, which Lua is much better at and which Ruby surpasses by also making programming easier. But Python was first at surpassing even Perl at growing library bindings.