gigaqps@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 month agoEmpirical datalemmy.worldimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1673
arrow-up1673imageEmpirical datalemmy.worldgigaqps@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareSubArcticTundra@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up42·1 month agoLeft is better because the poop hole is outside if the trousers
minus-squareSeductiveTortoise@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·1 month agoYou’re making a good argument here.
minus-squareSeth Taylor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 month agoOoooooh, this trend makes so much more sense now
minus-squareMBech@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 month agoBut also doesn’t cover up the genitals, which is my main reason for ever even wearing pants.
minus-squareAmerica@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 month agoThey trapped his member but maintained the freedom of his testicles. This is the future that liberals want
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoNot warmth and protection from thorny branches?
minus-squareMBech@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoI’m not some manly bushman traversing the wilderness on my daily journey to the office. I just don’t want Dorothy from HR on my ass…
minus-squareMongostein@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoI propose a 3rd option: a pair of pants for front and back legs. A male dog wouldn’t be able to pee in those.
minus-squareGloriousGasHole@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoI feel like that defeats the purpose of pants though. If it’s cold outside, I want to keep the McNuggets warm. I’m now picturing what it might be like if we all walked around in pants where the only parts exposed were the front and our butt hole.
minus-squareI_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoThey make those for potty training. https://tinyundies.com/products/tiny-chaps-baby-chaps-split-pants-for-elimination-communication?srsltid=AU7gw4WmS_hOkg2fPFnPhzjUWtL-4MtXb8NfNlXvVn-bzMf79Pmaktbv
minus-squareMongostein@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoFor a human yes, but dogs loooooove to pee on stuff, even in the winter
minus-square[deleted]@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoPlus the tail can wag freely!
Left is better because the poop hole is outside if the trousers
You’re making a good argument here.
Ooooooh, this trend makes so much more sense now
But also doesn’t cover up the genitals, which is my main reason for ever even wearing pants.
They trapped his member but maintained the freedom of his testicles. This is the future that liberals want
You assume he still has his testicles…
Not warmth and protection from thorny branches?
I’m not some manly bushman traversing the wilderness on my daily journey to the office. I just don’t want Dorothy from HR on my ass…
I propose a 3rd option: a pair of pants for front and back legs. A male dog wouldn’t be able to pee in those.
I feel like that defeats the purpose of pants though. If it’s cold outside, I want to keep the McNuggets warm.
I’m now picturing what it might be like if we all walked around in pants where the only parts exposed were the front and our butt hole.
They make those for potty training.
https://tinyundies.com/products/tiny-chaps-baby-chaps-split-pants-for-elimination-communication?srsltid=AU7gw4WmS_hOkg2fPFnPhzjUWtL-4MtXb8NfNlXvVn-bzMf79Pmaktbv
For a human yes, but dogs loooooove to pee on stuff, even in the winter
Plus the tail can wag freely!
This!