🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agoAnon's class fails expectationssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square96fedilinkarrow-up1472
arrow-up1472imageAnon's class fails expectationssh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agomessage-square96fedilink
minus-squarerumschlumpel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoAlso, duckduckgoing it, there are quite a few sources that still claim that the British Empire wasn’t profitable for the government in Britain, or regular British people, e.g.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2598015 https://iea.org.uk/media/empire-and-slavery-did-not-make-britain-rich-finds-new-iea-book/ (I’m not that knowledgable about the quality of these particular sources, just demonstrating that the claim isn’t rare)
minus-squaregandalf_der_13te@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month ago https://iea.org.uk/media/empire-and-slavery-did-not-make-britain-rich-finds-new-iea-book/ thanks, especially this second link seems convincing to me. they argue fairly well, with clear arguments and meaningful logical conclusions.
Also, duckduckgoing it, there are quite a few sources that still claim that the British Empire wasn’t profitable for the government in Britain, or regular British people, e.g.:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2598015
https://iea.org.uk/media/empire-and-slavery-did-not-make-britain-rich-finds-new-iea-book/
(I’m not that knowledgable about the quality of these particular sources, just demonstrating that the claim isn’t rare)
thanks, especially this second link seems convincing to me. they argue fairly well, with clear arguments and meaningful logical conclusions.