via
Snapchat scans private messages.
Not just public posts or stories. private group chats between you and your closest contacts. automated AI. no human reviewed it first, got flagged and reported.
Snapchat AI → FBI → local police → school → arrest.
in under an hour.
Snapchat’s privacy policy says it may share your information with law enforcement when it believes there is a risk of harm. the definition of “risk of harm” is determined by an algorithm.
you are not told when a message is flagged.
you are not told when a report is filed.
you find out when the police arrive.
I like how the cybernews websites cookie settings refers to tracking cookies with its 1,742 partners and they have the cheek to report on how big tech is tracking us
Outrage sells
Layers and layers of outrage.
Not just public posts or stories. private group chats between you and your closest contacts. automated AI. no human reviewed it first, got flagged and reported.
I think people just fundamentally do not understand what the word "private"means. If you are sending a message via centralized service (Snapchat, Facebook, Tiktok, e-mail, etc) it is de-facto not private*. Just because the communication is between two people and not publicly viewable to other users doesn’t give it any special “privacy” status compared the rest of the platform. The operator owns the platform, they can read anything that you type in or upload.
For a message to be actually private it must be encrypted before it leaves your device and decrypted on the recipient’s device, that’s it.
*There are some services that provide end to end encryption of messages but they are not the norm. No e-mail is ever private, even services like Proton only keep things encrypted on their own servers, once that e-mail reaches a gmail inbox it is just as readable as any other.
For a message to be actually private it must be encrypted
You confuse ‘private’ and ‘secret’.
They are functionally the same when you are talking about online communications. If your message is not secret it is not private, the operator of the messaging service can see the contents of the message.
Private, in the sense of “contains sensitive information that I don’t want public” is just a feeling. Saying those things in a Snapchat “private” message is no different than posting them in a “private” message board. The number of people who can read those messages is reduced but still contains significantly more than you and your intended recipient.
They are functionally the same when you are talking about online communications. I
To people who work in security, they are absofuckinglutely not the same.
This is why I came around to adopting the newer language of “DMs/direct messages” instead of the former “PMs/private messages.”
The point of all this is to perpetuate a culture of fear. Yes it’s enforcing the police state, yes it’s an overreach of AI and its power; but the point is to silence those who dissent but are able to be manipulated by fear. They’ve taken the MO of previous authoritarian states where neighbors would spy on each other and automated it
Surprise!
No, not really. Our latent narcissism will be the end of us. Really.
Please don’t post slop in your post description. If you can’t write a summary yourself then let the article speak for itself.
It was copy and pasted from the original tweet, Optional didn’t generate it.
Most likely it is AI generated tho :)
It’s from the OP on tumblr. Whether they had AI help them or not idk and idc. The % of commenters who RTFA is so low, any summary is helpful.
Did this happen again?
No, seems to be the same incident from a while back. (January 2025)
I’m so out of the loop. Did someone shoot someone for the snaps?
And? How is anyone at all not aware they do this? All of them do. Mostly the reading part.
People think that the word “private” in “private message” means that the messages are ONLY between them and the recipient, I don’t know why so many people believe this but it seems like the majority of user’s think this way.
