fyi: it’s “drugs”

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wanted one since long before then. I am a bit worried we’ll end up with a strongly conservative matriarchy that won’t look severely different than what we have now, but I think the only chance we have to swing left of ‘left’ is to shake up the patriarchy.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Was it too much to hope they dropped and broke the mold with Rowling?

          Yeah, that could also be a bad way to go, I think we’re nearly as likely to get there with the current patriarchy path in a gen or two.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Anarchy sounds nice until you have a task big enough to require people to work together, or to do shitty work no one wants to do, or to deal with outside aggressors, or to resolve conflict.

          There’s probably something in between anarchy, dictatorship, republic, communism that works, but we haven’t found it yet.

          • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 hours ago

            This has been solved many many times. Kropotkin addresses this in Mutual Aid. You form confederations, and call regular meetings to form pacts and mutual trade.

            Ironically anarchy doesn’t mean no governance, it means no state and government. A good anarchist society would have plenty of agreed upon rules and expectations, they just wouldn’t be enforced by a body of monopolistic violence.

            Villages of quisi to fully anarchist peoples operated for centuries and millennia in this form of communal structure until the nation-state was born in the late medieval ages and spread abroad through European colonialism.

            • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I was pretty sure that the first agrarian societies led away from community rule towards state rule.

          • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            The outside aggressors are a legitimate problem, but anarchist societies (e.g. Catalonia) have dealt with the others just fine.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              One might argue that a 3-year test just post civil war wasn’t a solid shakedown cruise.

              I’m fairly certain the US would just devolve into internal armed conflict and a return to slavery.

              • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Alternatively, one could argue that they accomplished quite a lot in the context of wartime shortages of resources, betrayals, etc. Just as one example, they expanded bus service all over Barcelona while also making it free and more frequent, by having the bus workers run everything democratically.

              • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Perhaps, but since just about every other system has already devolved into internal armed conflict and slavery at various points, it seems like a good idea to try the one that hasn’t yet.