If I had to choose between a Harper era conservative and a Poilievre era conservative, I’d pick the Harper era.
I would disagree for two reasons:
we had Harper-era conservatives as an option already, and we’re forgetting how bad it was because we remember them at their accidentally-least-worst when they were bumbling at being cruel bootstrap elitists.
even if Carney at his worst were like Harper at his best, that shows how Carney retains potential that Harper and the cons just don’t have.
In short: Carney’s situation is the cons’ policy. The two are not the same.
I would disagree for two reasons:
In short: Carney’s situation is the cons’ policy. The two are not the same.
Except Carney is also not licking America’s boots or attacking trans people.