• lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Pretty sure only pixels are, but Motorola was working on one. It’s fucking stupid that the only phone they support is manufactured by the company that is causing most of the problem. Their phone sucks too.

            • pmk@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Next flagship Motorola will have official GrapheneOS support. It will be very expensive. After that, hopefully more mid-level Motorola phones will be supported too.

              • BrownSugarBits@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                OR - they could dumb down grapheneOS so that it can run on a lot of other phones ?? ? maybe? yes? I get the desire to be able to encrypt the entire drive - that IS important, but I think its more important to get the functionality of graphene provides to more people. A non-google based phone is pointless on only google based hardware.

                • TootTootComingThru@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The point of GOS isn’t to “encrypt the entire drive” though, the whole point is a secure, private and stable platform that actually works. Their team chose Pixel phones because the hardware makes it possible to make it more secure, as in it has specific things in it that many other phones don’t have.

                  Adding more supported phones would be great, but it would mean having to support that many more configurations and likely sacrificing the main features and stability as it is not a huge team and afaik they’re all volunteers.

                  The whole point is security and privacy, adding whatever phone you have in your pocket for support is a) not realistically possible for them or b) would compromise the entire project due to either how many resources they have or due to the actual hardware of that particular phone.

                  It’s not stupid, it’s a pretty clever group of people working on GOS. It’s not perfect but that’s what it is right now, I get that Google is an evil company but you can always buy second hand and at the end of the day there’s like maybe one less evil phone company among the many so it’s a problem with just about every phone you’re gonna buy.

                • pmk@piefed.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I would love to see GrapheneOS on Fairphone, but, you know, asking them to weaken security is a bit like asking Stallman to support proprietary software. Some people don’t compromise on their core mission. Hopefully more phones will start having secure hardware in the future. I think a lot of people value security, sustainability, and degoogling. Right now there’s no hardware where you can get all three.

                  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    I’m more excited for the Linux support efforts on Fairphone tbh, not a fan of Android

              • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                The flagship Motorola also sucks, missing a bunch of features that even my $150 Samsung J3 had

        • pmk@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I got a cheap used Pixel at the tail end of support, it’ll last a few more years. After that I hope there will be more Motorola phones than the currently planned.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not really. The companies will continue removing end-user ownership, even if they move to alternatives. The profits must flow, the number must go up.

        • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Boycott the technology they have forced on humanity. There’s a growing number of basic tasks that require a device and there’s a large portion of the population that just doesn’t care enough to not fall in line.

          • connorx100@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            True, no change can be done without a will that comes from most of the people, but that’s life, somehow you need to feel like a feather moved by other people’s choices.

            Focusing on what we can do is a better choice.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          With how apple shit is treated like divine ambrosia and, in many places, a status symbol, I seriously doubt any boycott against them will have any effect.

          Android is like Windows in the 1990s. It’s fucking everywhere and literally too big to boycott. Most OEMs also prefer to play ball with Google and keep the phones locked because it’s profitable for them as well. Boycotting a specific OEM might cause some damage to them, but it won’t budge Google. It’s good that some companies are making phones that ship with more open android clones, but those phones are still too expensive for most people to buy