The power trip / ban doesn’t bother me, but the misinformation does. They present as leftist, but flare up around US elections discouraging voter turnout via ‘bOtH siDeS’ garbage. that only ever elevates shit like MAGA.

In the linked thread, OP promotes rioting while discouraging voter turnout. My comments agreed with activism like riots, but pointed out that it’s not an either-or thing. You can riot -and- vote; and even if you don’t have it in you to riot, still do vote.

Banned.

You can see my removed comment quoted in the post after mine.

This ‘blue MAGA’ tankie shit is somehow worse than the loud-and-clear MAGA shit over on Reddit - at least those neonazis were honest about who they were.

Anywho, YSK. Spaces like r/conservative were clearly labeled and easy to avoid; LateStageCapitalism@lemmy.world presents as a cause worth rallying around, but only until you peel up the veneer and see that they’re the same fucking thing.

Also please vote. In addition to whatever flavor of activism tickles your fancy.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Yeah that’s not a serious community. Like I can understand why an anarchist would be vehemently opposed to voting, but a socialist? No. PTB.

    Edit: and furthermore, if they’re so against voting, why haven’t they disabled both downvotes AND upvotes, and only use just the other sort algorithms?

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Anarchist here: voting might be the least important, least effective action you take … but as long as the state still holds power, you should still do it.

    • CubitOom@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most anarchist are quite supportive of voting, they would just rather have a direct democracy. The real issue for most is hierarchy. Ofcourse, that’s not true for all anarchists.

        • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          Exactly. Left-anarchist myself, and the only way is, surprise, voting. Voting and debating. Democracy, for god’s sake. A leader doesn’t necessarily means higher hierarchy; what it really means (or should mean) is just higher responsability with the capacity of fulfilling it.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’re never going to get a reasonable answer from them if you get any answer at all. Anarchism only works until the difficult questions start getting asked. This is why there is no anarchist society on the planet other than some extremely small communities that would more reasonably be considered communes.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I’m talking about electoralist voting, not voting in general. Check out our instance governance rules

    • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Edit: and furthermore, if they’re so against voting, why haven’t they disabled both downvotes AND upvotes, and only use just the other sort algorithms?

      Anti-electoralists are not necessarily against voting in literally all circumstances. We’re against voting for candidates for political office.