• Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’ll just stay inside the hut thanks. An animal that big will starve to death without anything substantial to eat. And by substantial I mean like elephants and shit. These animals needed a lot, and I mean a lot, of calories to keep going. One month should be plenty of time for attrition to get the job done.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Not nearly as much as you’d think.

      As it happens there’s an XKCD about it.

      https://what-if.xkcd.com/78/

      Larger animals are more energy efficient, and require fewer calories per pound than smaller ones do.

      So, it’s likely the T-Rex is being fed over this month, possibly by your competition. It would be fine eating a full grown adult once a week or so, though it wouldn’t be happy about it.

      • Etterra@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It depends on its age, activity level and metabolism. A warm-ish blooded active predator is gonna need way more than 1 human a week. It’ll be wandering its large territory looking for meals, not charging after candy bars.

        A large adult is also likely too slow to catch a running human; one quick turn, inconvenient obstruction (huge tree, boulder, invincible hut) could result in a leg-breaking accident that the T-Rex would know better than to bother with. A young or adolescent animal would be way more dangerous though.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      This was my exact thought. A month without the t rex eating would be plenty of time for it to die.