vegeta@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 天前Meet *sshole, the vulnerability that lets hackers SSH into Linux devicesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1408cross-posted to: linux@sh.itjust.workscybersecurity@infosec.publinux@lemmy.world
arrow-up1408external-linkMeet *sshole, the vulnerability that lets hackers SSH into Linux devicesarstechnica.comvegeta@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 天前message-square101fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@sh.itjust.workscybersecurity@infosec.publinux@lemmy.world
minus-squareheartSagan5@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·2 天前Alpine? The one that doesn’t use glibc? Wasn’t this why they chose a different C runtime? For security. Ooops.
minus-squareAppleMango@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·2 天前I feel like alpine is more well-known for being lightweight than secure
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 天前“Security” and getting rid of that pesky copyleft licensing in order to make it so corporate users have to give back as little as possible.
minus-squareExLisper@lemmy.curiana.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 天前Yes, one bug invalidates the whole project. As everyone knows, no bugs in glibc were ever discovered.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 天前Dude. One issue in the time of how many in glibc…
Alpine? The one that doesn’t use glibc? Wasn’t this why they chose a different C runtime? For security. Ooops.
I feel like alpine is more well-known for being lightweight than secure
“Security” and getting rid of that pesky copyleft licensing in order to make it so corporate users have to give back as little as possible.
Yes, one bug invalidates the whole project. As everyone knows, no bugs in glibc were ever discovered.
Dude. One issue in the time of how many in glibc…