• Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    So, I’ve been going through making profiles for everybody, starting with Jeffrey Epstein, and generating a new, connected note when I see new information (Obsidian). I’m running with the hypothesis and framework that “The Establishment” is a real criminal enterprise. What I’ve found seems to be five branches, ranging from finance to intelligence, all interconnected. Two prevalent philosophies beyond greed and power: Christen Zionism and Transhumanism. Basically, it is a big coherent effort by lots of individuals and agencies with like goals. Trump, I call the disruptor. Basically, Trump seems to be so full of himself that he thinks he can take on the system AND be a dictator, from what I’ve gathered (189 profiles, including individuals, agencies, events, timeline, doctrines)

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Serious question about his supporters: Are they cool with this? Like, hey a $200 mio. ballroom at the white house is exactly what I voted for.

    • crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Who knows. I know there is a rift that has started within MAGA, over the Epstein stuff. I predict there will be no MAGA as it stands by the end of this reign of Trump, siting incidents like these with the ballroom, Zionist, pedos and more to come. Trump isn’t worried about anyone, especially this term, as it is with all the presidents as they concentrate on their legacy (ego,) not their constituents, and campaign promises. The working class that voted for him will equally get a wake up call by terms-end, a come to Jesus moment.

  • theparadox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Better to get upset about a stupid ballroom than any other, more damning issue in the current news cycle that the current administration might prefer you forgot about…

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    3 days ago

    Building an opulent ballroom while making sure millions will lose their homes, go without healthcare, and starve? This sounds like the last days of the French monarchy.

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s actually just a distraction. The real corruption is the 5 trillion in tax cuts for billionaires and the 1 trillion in healthcare cuts for Medicaid to partially for it. If you’re talking millions you’re being distracted.

  • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Lib. “Crony capitalism” is not a thing. It’s just capitalism. There is no form of capitalism that doesn’t involve cronyism, that is just the natural conclusion of private ownership.

    • appropriateghost@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I agree with you 100%, and Marx was very clear that capitalism is filled with theft and oppression. It’s nice that Marx also at times rested his critique of capitalism abstracting all the crony-ness and analyzed capitalism with ‘good intentions,’ showing that even without the oppression/theft it’s a failed system.

      edit: misread!

        • crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          I like to blatantly call it out for those that are still struggling with it. I understand for those like us, it is redundant.

          • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            41
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            That is not only not helpful but actually bad. You’re just muddying the waters.

            The communists disdain to hide their views and aims

            You are doing the opposite of blatantly calling it out you are reinforcing those who may be still struggling to understand in their assumption that this is the “bad” capitalism and leaving open the idea there is some sort of “good” capitalism.

  • drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 days ago

    He is planning on never leaving. Or he wouldn’t bother. He doesnt do things with foresight unless FOR himself.