• RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What are the actual arguments you consider good from it? I didn’t see anything other than handwringing and “well technically”

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Less the arguments, more the evidence: there was nothing like a secret agreement to invade Poland, there were informalized areas the Nazis were to not go beyond and areas the Soviets were not to go beyond. This would be indicative of a percieved alliance if it wasn’t for the fact that at the same time, the Soviet Union was preparing for war with the Nazis and the Nazis the same for the Soviet Union, it was just a way to buy a bit of extra time as the west refused to join the Soviets until the war had become unavoidable on their turf.

      • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Secret Protocol, Article I & II

        Article I

        In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement in the areas belonging to the Baltic States (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), the northern boundary of Lithuania shall represent the boundary of the spheres of influence of Germany and U.S.S.R. In this connection the interest of Lithuania in the Vilnius area is recognized by each party. Article II edit

        In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement of the areas belonging to the Polish state, the spheres of influence of Germany and the U.S.S.R. shall be bounded approximately by the line of the rivers Narew, Vistula and San.

        The question of whether the interests of both parties make desirable the maintenance of an independent Polish state and how such a state should be bounded can only be definitely determined in the course of further political developments.

        In any event both governments will resolve this question by means of a friendly agreement.

          • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Are we really pretending we don’t know what “In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement of the areas belonging to the Polish state” means

            • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Oh so it doesn’t say what you claim it does, but we’re supposed to just accept that it’s secretly a coded message, based on what?

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yes, this was not an agreement to invade jointly, the USSR entered Poland 17 days after the Nazis did. This was the Soviet Union providing a “no-go” line for the Nazis in the event of Nazi invasion, largely including areas Poland had invaded and annexed from Lithuania and Ukraine a couple decades prior.

          • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            This was them dividing the country between them for when the war was concluded. Unless we pretend we don’t know what this means

            In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement of the areas belonging to the Polish state,

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Neither country expected the treaty to last, and the areas in Poland were largely areas annexed from Ukraine and Lithuania beforehand. Is your point that the Soviets expected the Nazis to stay non-hostile until the end of World War II or even beyond it? Not only would that have been stupid, we have evidence to the contrary, that neither country expected the treaty to last.