I think this warrants a fediverse wide boycott of all piefed/fedia instances until this is rectified.

  • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Oh yeah for sure I was just curious as to your thoughts on people taking this project and building in their own ideologically motivated blocking. I know that there is nothing to be done about it as its all open source I just find it scummy that they do this in the first place. I get not wanting to federate with specific instances but the way this works is to just automatically make it one way only unless the person using their fork manually changes it.

    I don’t want to force them to see our posts or comments or anything idgaf about that I just don’t want to have to guess which people I can see on my end can actually see my replies to them ya know?

    • Blaze (he/him)@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      unless the person using their fork manually changes it.

      Updating the defederation blocklist is done via the admin UI. A fork implies having to recreate the source code and modify it. This is different.

      Recent comment from another admin

      This is exactly how it works. I started a PieFed instance and made the decision (during setup) to trim the defederation list down to none. Users can block on the account level.

      https://wetshav.ing/comment/92409