• Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Odyssey roughly translates to “The story of Odysseus”, so yes, the name existed before Homer’s story. The semantic connection of odyssey and a long, dangerous and arduous journey came way after that.

      • Klear@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Odyssey no longer feels like a word. Damn you, semantic saturation!

        • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Wow, I really hate to be this pedantic, but it’s semantic satiation. I only remember because I had a similar experience thinking it was “saturation” because it just makes more sense, but apparently we’re wrong.

          • Klear@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            No need to apologise, this is the kind of thing I hate getting wrong. Satiation. Satiation.
            Hopefully it will stick in the future.

      • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The Odyssey was called Odysseia. The suffix -eia is an abstract noun suffix, so it’s sort of like a titular case for the name. Following the same logic, it would be Homereia and thus Homerey.

      • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The Odyssey was part of the Epic Cycle, so Homer likely inherited the figure of Odysseus from those stories. Whether he made up the name or the name Odysseus was already established, we simply do not know. Much has been lost to time, sadly.