• VeryFrugal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    this is supposed to be more secure because it costs money

    It makes blaming someone really easy though and that’s all that matters in a corporate world.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is legitimately it. The same reason corporations often pay for Linux (e.g. RHEL)—the people in charge want to be able to pick up a phone and harass someone until they fix their problem. They simply can’t fathom any alternative approach to managing dependencies.

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not just pick up the phone and harass someone but to also have someone to press a lawsuit against if things go really wrong. With free software the liability typically ends at the user which means all they can do is fire the employee and eat the loss. Suppose now corporate paid for it, well now there is a contract and a party that can be sued.