Edit: /j

  • ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    A lot harder to buy off the general population than it is to buy single representatives, everyone would have to know about the corruption and anti corruption watchdogs would have plenty of evidence

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      No, it’s not hard, it happened many times in Greek cities. Polish noble democracy in Commonwealth also became corrupted in exactly this way. You can see it even nowadays in the part of bourgeois democracies that are direct, for example European presidental elections, “vote x no matter what” blocks are found and it result in electing such people like Nawrocki in Poland. I mention him because he’s incredible example, barely anyone ever heard of that guy before elections (except prosecutioner) but the magical hand of PiS chairman marked him as the desired candidate and suddenly he actually won against very well known liberal politician Trzaskowski (and Trzaskowski was least horrible lib in Poland).

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          37 minutes ago

          It wouldn’t be viewed in this light, just as current vote X no matter who aren’t percieved as corrupted. Ever heard of the patron-client system? It fucked up direct democracy every single time, and would resurface hard in politics.

          • ryannathans@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            35 minutes ago

            That would be ridiculously more expensive to bribe the general population rather than members of government