Based on the description on their site, the controller includes a built-in battery: "8.39 Wh Li-ion battery​, 35+ hours of gameplay… "

That was disappointing for me. Specially condidering the Steam Frame’s controllers make use of AA batteries: “​One replaceable AA battery per controller, ​ 40hr battery life​”

AA Batteries might not be as convenient to use, but being able to replace them is a great advantage. All my Xbox360 controllers still work fine, but none of my PS3’ Dualshock 3s.

The official docking station could be used to recharge (rechargables) AA batteries so the functionality could remain the same.

  • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Kids toys are another use case for non rechargeable. I’m not going to buy a 100 pack of rechargeable batteries.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Um, I use rechargeable batteries in all my kid’s toys? With how often they need to be replaced, these batteries have already long paid for themselves.

          • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Sure, but your an outlier.

            Kids toys are a use case for non rechargeable. In fact, I wouldn’t be shocked its the most common use case.

            Before I had kids I used rechargeable for everything but flashlights and smoke detectors.

            • wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I don’t think you are the norm with the amount of batteries your kids consume. Most people don’t have that many toys nor have that many kids.

              • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Sure but thats not the point. The discussion got started from someone saying that there is no use case for disposable batteries in kids toys, which there is.

                • wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  And yet your example is an outlier. They haven’t said anything wrong, you just want to be right. They do not have a hundred batteries they need to replace constantly- just you and your large extended family. And no one said there’s zero use case for disposable batteries in this thread (go ahead and find the quote, you won’t).

                  • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 hour ago

                    The entire discussion that got started was because I said kids toys are a use case for disposable and they responded saying its the dumbest comment they’ve ever read. So they are saying under no circumstances should you use dispobable in a kids toy. That is flat out wrong.

              • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Oh wow what a huge sample size of 4.

                Lemmy is a very anti consumption site, and I would guarantee you they are lying is well. If I walked into their house right now I would find at least one toy with disposable batteries.

                • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Yeah I guess it’s “weird” to use rechargeable batteries which are only slightly more than regular batteries but can be used over and over and over again. Putting aside “anti consumption” that’s just plain the better deal

                  • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 hour ago

                    Well it depends. That is the point I’m making. I put 25 cents worth of batteries in my sons buzz light year 7 years ago and it still works. Rechargeable make no sense for that.

                    Thats it. Thats the whole point. I was responding to the person that said that using disposable in kids toys was the dumbest comment they’ve ever read lol

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          You can get 8 rechargeable AA’s from amazon for $12, or $1.44 each. Non-rechargeables are $0.78 each. If a rechargeable battery prevents you from having to buy a second set of non-rechargeables then it’s paid for itself.

          If you want, you can just put rechargeable batteries in their most commonly used toys. Or better yet, teach your kids how to replace the and charge the batteries themselves. A 4 or 5 year old should be able to handle that without issue. And it means you aren’t doing everything for your kids, which means they learn some self-sufficiency

          • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Firstly, the rechargeable dont last as long in the toy. So if you have a ton of toys you need a lot of both AA and AAA because the toys will die more often.

            Second, using AAA as an example, I can get non rechargeable for as low as 12 cents each right now. Rechargeable look to be 77 cents a piece if you can find them on sale.

            Ive already looked into it for my family. We have rechargeable for things that make sense. I would need somewhere in the range of 150 to 200 rechargeable batteries and it would be a much bigger hastle. And guess what happens to those too? Recycled, because I would have no additional use for them beyond toys. And it turns out people dont like buying used batteries second hand.

            I’m sure there are some people that actually do what you are suggesting, but saying that is the dumbest comment on Lemmy for stating what 99% of parents do is just silly.

            • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              7 hours ago

              How many AA powered toys does your family have?? I’m actually baffled that anyone would possibly need up to 200 AAs for their kid’s toys. Are there non-powered toys in your household? I’m not trying to shame you, I’m just intrigued.

              • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                So ive got 3 kids and a large extended family. My kids are the youngest so we are constantly being given toys second hand. Looks like at the moment, ive got almost 50 toys that take batteries in some form. Most take 2, some take 4. 200 is admittedly a high end exaggeration. But ive changes batteries in hundreds of re-homed toys at this point and I have never come across a single set of recharable batteries.

                When my kids grow out of them, we usually give them to someone else, as they were given to us.