• lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          hah.

          personally i think a big part of the problem is that real-name identification for things that shouldn’t need it is just sort of accepted, rather than being criticised as the massive invasion of privacy that it is. whether it includes children or not is a side note in my mind.

            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              well, we’re here. but the companies and governments pushing this are already looking at possible next steps, like building systems where your real identity is used everywhere.

                • lime!@feddit.nu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  maybe. when china did it with their law about children not using their phones after curfew, they handled it by building a face database of everyone except children, then matching against that.