Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to RPGMemes @ttrpg.network · 18 hours agoI took 162 damage in two attacks on Tuesday. No fucks givenlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1280
arrow-up1280imageI took 162 damage in two attacks on Tuesday. No fucks givenlemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to RPGMemes @ttrpg.network · 18 hours agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squareMajinBlayze@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 hours agoWolves have an intelligence of 3, few beasts “more mindless” would be aggressive enough to face tank the party. I guess all I’m really saying is that there really isn’t that much in the game that should stand and deliver against the closest enemy until it dies
minus-squareBeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoI give the wolf mentats, then cast Tasha’s hideous laughter
minus-squaresmeg@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 hours agoOK, when I said “beast” I should really have said “monster”, because things like oozes, constructs, and undead are often stupid enough to do just that
minus-squarezalgotext@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 hours agoIt was clear what you meant, but you left an opportunity for someone to be technically correct and they jumped all over it
minus-squareMajinBlayze@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-27 hours agoYeah, fair enough; seems we’re saying the same thing then. I really got the impression from the initial comment that only uniquely smart things would use tactics. I can see how that might have been meant more broadly
Wolves aren’t so mindless!
Wolves have an intelligence of 3, few beasts “more mindless” would be aggressive enough to face tank the party.
I guess all I’m really saying is that there really isn’t that much in the game that should stand and deliver against the closest enemy until it dies
I give the wolf mentats, then cast Tasha’s hideous laughter
OK, when I said “beast” I should really have said “monster”, because things like oozes, constructs, and undead are often stupid enough to do just that
It was clear what you meant, but you left an opportunity for someone to be technically correct and they jumped all over it
Yeah, fair enough; seems we’re saying the same thing then. I really got the impression from the initial comment that only uniquely smart things would use tactics. I can see how that might have been meant more broadly