• Ardens@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    25 minutes ago

    So, they know it’s only windows users that downloads it? Interesting - their version 17 must have sucked so much that people switched back, and now they give it another go?

  • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    Is that headline number for the free or paid for version? I couldn’t tell from the article.

    Looks like all downloads are direct from them, so it’s much harder for distros using torrents to know their install base, but I suspect they’re not much different.

    I’ve seen increased activity with the Arch, Mint & Raspios torrents that I seed - although I don’t have cold figures to say how much by.

  • HaraVier@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Gotta have to congratulate the folks over at Zorin OS for this succes. Mad props!

    Though, I gotta wonder: Can we expect similar numbers for Linux Mint or Ubuntu? Or, has Zorin OS somehow won the post-W10 SEO-wars? And, if so, how?

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    What even is zorin os lol I’ve never even heard of it. Normies really do surprise me often like this, like they mathematically calculate to pick the strangest least expected things through the most alien of mechanisms. Delightful news!

  • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m not to familiar with zorin, and I don’t see it recommended often. What’s the deal? Any criticisms of it? Especially for new users?

    • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think it’s just a really good Windows-like. It uses a modified GNOME that looks pretty good. Though as a KDE fangirl, I probably wouldn’t be able to see it as anything other than GNOME. (◕દ◕)

      It’s based on Ubuntu, so I’m sure support is good and breakage is infrequent.

      It also looks like you can pay $50 and get access to the pro version, which can mimic any of the major desktops and also lets you use their exclusive creative suite. If that’s any good, it’s no wonder people are flocking to it. Linux is still kinda mid for creatives.

      Kinda seems like the new Mint, not that Mint is going anywhere.

    • AliasAKA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It looks and feels a bit like windows with the theming it has out of the box. So it’s probably an easier on ramp and possibly recommended in “what Linux is most like windows” google searches and the like.

  • Mactan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    it’s great for anybody that doesn’t need it for gaming. that LTS packages always gets painfully stale for non-steam