With the UK apparently floating ideas of a VPN ban it’s got me worried about the future of anonymity online. Now people have already pointed out that a VPN ban doesn’t make sense because of all the legitimate uses of one and wouldn’t even be enforceable anyway, but that got me thinking.

What if governments ordered websites (such as social media sites) to block traffic originating from a VPN node? Lots of sites already do this (or restrict your activity if they detect a VPN) to mitigate spam etc. and technically that wouldn’t interfere with “legitimate” (in the eyes of the gov) VPN usage like logging onto corporate networks remotely

It’s already a pain with so many sites either blocking you from access or making you jump through a million captchas using VPNs now. I’m worried it’s about to get a whole lot worse

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    How can you ban a VPN (virtual private network)?

    I have a VPN setup at home and at my parents home, I can connect either as if I was at either location physically. My office has VPNs for connecting between offices and connecting from remote locations. And dont get me started about being and to purchase a VPS in any country you want, and run a VPN on it.

    Does this mean people and companies can no longer setup their own VPN’s.

    If this is about privacy and anonymity, evey bowsers on any device has a unique identifying fingerprint that allows it to be identifiable even using a VPN. So what is this ban even targeting?

    The Hidden Tracking Method Your VPN Can’t Block - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJOpHSPkWMo

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      For profit VPNs I think is what everyone means. So people can get past region blocks or censorship. Since they offset very little else.

    • ISOmorph@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      So what is this ban even targeting?

      UK is one of the forerunners in regard to online ID checks, for example for porn sites. Brits now regularly use VPNs to escape those checks

      • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Though a VPN does not provide you with guaranteed anonymity, it only allows you to access webpages and local services as if you were at that physical location, or on that specific network.

        Connecting to your work office VPN and browsing Facebook does not make you anonymous, it’s just makes you look like you are sitting in the office.

        • ISOmorph@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          I think you’re missing the point. A brit without VPN has to use his actual digital ID to access pornhub, as in name, address, birthday, etc… With a VPN you can spoof your location and access pornhub without ID. This has nothing to do with masking your IP to browse the web.

          • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            And this is my point actually, what are they trying to ban, is it the use of a VPN completely, or is it for only VPN that spoof locations out of country. (Which is what allows someone to circumvent the age-id, at the moment.)

            Now that being said I work with people in the UK and they VPN into our office for network access and project file access. Does anyone see how this could impact access for Brits working with global firms for example?