With the UK apparently floating ideas of a VPN ban it’s got me worried about the future of anonymity online. Now people have already pointed out that a VPN ban doesn’t make sense because of all the legitimate uses of one and wouldn’t even be enforceable anyway, but that got me thinking.

What if governments ordered websites (such as social media sites) to block traffic originating from a VPN node? Lots of sites already do this (or restrict your activity if they detect a VPN) to mitigate spam etc. and technically that wouldn’t interfere with “legitimate” (in the eyes of the gov) VPN usage like logging onto corporate networks remotely

It’s already a pain with so many sites either blocking you from access or making you jump through a million captchas using VPNs now. I’m worried it’s about to get a whole lot worse

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Lots of places are applying that sort of regulation already. Problem is, how do you know which IPs are VPNs? There are some obvious ways, and many people block some VPNs already but you can’t block every VPN. I can spin up a VPN right now and open it up to users in other countries. It’s impossible.

    The gov could theoretically maintain a repository of “known” VPNs that they could require sites to block, though. They could even force them to be blocked at the DNS level. This would probably be fairly effective.

    But that’s also most certainly going to be abused as well.

  • stupid_asshole69 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Yes they can ban it, you will face repercussions if you violate that ban just like if you violate the ban your country probably has on heroin or machine guns.

    You can get around it by using doh and a http proxy configured in your web browser, not at the os level.

  • eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    You can always just route your traffic through a roll your own tunnel to some cheap cloud VM. Modern automation makes it even painless.

    • Buckshot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I do this. I already had a cloud vps with a vpn on it for remote access so i figured i might as well set it up to route traffic as well.

      Still get loads of sites blocking me

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      People won’t do that as we are lazy as a species. Any sort of friction and the people who do it well drop considerably.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        People used to not use VPNs too - until they realized how useful they can be by spread in pop culture and increasing tech awareness of the general public.

        If commercial VPNs are banned the tech savvy will move onto a replacement immediately, and the knowledge will slowly expand through social circles and social media until it has similar penetration in society.

        A VPN ban would be both harmful (to business and consumers short term) and pointless.

  • chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I have moments when I think “I might get banned for this”, this is one of those moments.

    You may try to ban vpns but you can not really, people usually find ways around censorship. We are notorious for this stuff, as a species.

    Its infuriating to me when people just roll over for the powers that be. They may ban some nodes, others will pop up, those will get banned too and so the cycle of cat and mouse begins.

    You can host your own vpn with wireguard. It takes a bit of figuring out, sure, but you can literally do so with a raspberry pi. Stick it in a network of choice and voila.

    Oh they may control stuff, but this is not a game that can be won, human repression is a futile effort, it may work for a while, but there is a reason why regimes fall. See the wall of Berlin and so many other examples.

    Fret not friend, for hope dies last.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They could ban VPNs and not play cat an mouse. I always think China allows some VPN use when they could stop it completely. I always think of the Matrix with the option of leaving.

  • bl4kers@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    That would severely cripple remote work/collaboration, which is essential for all megacorps. Unless there’s some sort of carve out for that I don’t see it happening

  • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Anything can be made illegal. Enforcement is tricky. At the moment it is very easy to block Wireguard protocol at the ISP level, some even do it. But that would probably push Wireguard and others to invest more in obfuscation.

    As a sidenote, it bugs me that Wireguard does not support obfuscation out of the box, and you have to put it on top of wireguard.

  • James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s theoretically possible but difficult to actually do. China has a large central government and surveillance state, VPNs are essentially banned there, and yet a large percentage of the population uses them daily to the point where it’s commonplace.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I still believe they let it happen. Could be wrong but it reminded me of the Machines in the Matrix.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      24 hours ago

      If China can’t do it then nobody can. I’ll only be worried if China manages to successfully block out VPN use in their country.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Snowflake or steganographic comunication, works even in North Corea, encrypted messages are not a solution, because they always cause suspicion in countries with strong surveillance and censorship. VPN are not the solution either, even in occidental coutries, there are a lot of webs which are not accesible with a VPN or Proxy, mostly streaming sites, eg. Rakuten and others.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That is not effective either and is easy to break. At least steganographic I know nothing about snowflake but if it’s similar it would be trivial.

        • Zerush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Steganographic messages are pretty save, not so because they are very difficult to reveal, but if they see an innocent selfie, a photo from a kitten or an mp3 from a famous song, they don’t think tat it can be a hidden message and don’t cause further interests, like an encrypted unreadable message do. Snowflake is another thing, often used by journalists in totalitary countries. https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity24/presentation/bocovich

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    How can you ban a VPN (virtual private network)?

    I have a VPN setup at home and at my parents home, I can connect either as if I was at either location physically. My office has VPNs for connecting between offices and connecting from remote locations. And dont get me started about being and to purchase a VPS in any country you want, and run a VPN on it.

    Does this mean people and companies can no longer setup their own VPN’s.

    If this is about privacy and anonymity, evey bowsers on any device has a unique identifying fingerprint that allows it to be identifiable even using a VPN. So what is this ban even targeting?

    The Hidden Tracking Method Your VPN Can’t Block - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJOpHSPkWMo

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      For profit VPNs I think is what everyone means. So people can get past region blocks or censorship. Since they offset very little else.

    • ISOmorph@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      So what is this ban even targeting?

      UK is one of the forerunners in regard to online ID checks, for example for porn sites. Brits now regularly use VPNs to escape those checks

      • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Though a VPN does not provide you with guaranteed anonymity, it only allows you to access webpages and local services as if you were at that physical location, or on that specific network.

        Connecting to your work office VPN and browsing Facebook does not make you anonymous, it’s just makes you look like you are sitting in the office.

        • ISOmorph@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          I think you’re missing the point. A brit without VPN has to use his actual digital ID to access pornhub, as in name, address, birthday, etc… With a VPN you can spoof your location and access pornhub without ID. This has nothing to do with masking your IP to browse the web.

          • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            And this is my point actually, what are they trying to ban, is it the use of a VPN completely, or is it for only VPN that spoof locations out of country. (Which is what allows someone to circumvent the age-id, at the moment.)

            Now that being said I work with people in the UK and they VPN into our office for network access and project file access. Does anyone see how this could impact access for Brits working with global firms for example?

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      That is false. Everyone says that but where where the hacks for direct TV or the Nagra 3 for dish? They never came besides massive money sitting on the table for whoever did. Or modern console jailbreaking? Have the PS5 and latest XBox have hacks?