GrapheneOS Hiring
grapheneos.org
GrapheneOS job opportunities.

Qualifications

  • Prior experience working on one or more of Android/AOSP-based operating systems, the Linux kernel and its hardening, memory allocators, or Android app development
  • Strong programming skills in relevant languages (in order from most to least common: Java, Kotlin, C++, C, Rust, JavaScript, TypeScript, arm64 assembly, Bash, Python)
  • Need to have enough experience to be comfortable to self direct workloads and submit finished features and fixes ready for review
  • Commitment to privacy and security principles
  • Ideally prior experience contributing to free and open source projects

Salary and remuneration will be commensurate with experience and aligned with industry standards. You will be employed as an independent contractor

  • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    11·
    1 day ago

    Salary and remuneration will be commensurate with experience and aligned with industry standards

    Neat, this might violate California law!

    The law states that any employer with “15 or more employees” must include “the pay scale for a position in any job posting.”

    At least 1 of those 15 employees “must be currently located in California,” according to the Department of Industrial Relations website. And, for the companies this applies to, a job posting must have a pay range “if the position may ever be filled in California, either in-person or remotely.”

    • l3db3tt3r@piefed.socialEnglish
      9·
      1 day ago

      FUD

      1. GrapheneOS is a non-profit out of Canada.
      2. It’s an “independent contractor” role. California has specific laws governing the classification of workers as employees versus independent contractors.
      • LukeZaz@beehaw.orgEnglish
        6·
        1 day ago

        FUD

        What is this, a crypto forum? You make it sound like they’re trying to single-handedly tear down GrapheneOS or something.

      • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish
        9·
        1 day ago

        1. doesn’t matter as long as they have employees in California

        2. doesn’t state it must be for employees only, it’s for any job posting

        Tech workers try to have any spine when it comes to worker’s rights challenge

        • l3db3tt3r@piefed.socialEnglish
          4·
          1 day ago

          Let me do the work for you; since you’d rather just spread FUD then look for facts.

          1. https://www.linkedin.com/company/grapheneos/people/
          • 0 California “employees” listed
          1. https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/SB3_FAQ.htm (I just want to point out that there is a distinction; and I am not a lawyer) “Any individual performing any kind of compensable work for the employer who is not a bona fide independent contractor would be considered and counted as an employee, including salaried executives, part-time workers, minors, and new hires.”
          • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish
            8·
            1 day ago

            1. Cool, that’s why my original comment says might. I don’t keep track of where random organizations employ people.

            2. You linked to a page about minimum wage, not the law related to job postings. Again, this law does not state that the posting must be for employee positions.

            Any criticism you don’t like hearing isn’t FUD. This would be a shit practice even if it wasn’t illegal in California.

            • l3db3tt3r@piefed.socialEnglish
              1·
              1 day ago

              It isn’t criticism if it isn’t based on fact. The U in FUD stands for Uncertainty; and what do you think “might” falls under, or it’s relation to sowing Doubt?

              The law related to job postings, is a labor law, that also covers minimum wage, and uses the same definitions. Labor Code Section 432.3 (Pay Transparency Law) Labor Code Section 1197.5 - California Equal Pay Act (Fair Pay Act) Labor Code Section 2750.3 (Employee vs Independent Contractor Classification)