• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Look at the writers guild of America pretending they don’t live in a fascist dictatorship where nothing matters but profits. How quaint.

    The chances of this getting blocked under antitrust laws is roughly equivalent to me hitting oil in my back garden.

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I for one thing the merger is a great idea. Why shouldn’t the company famous for cancelling shows after one season merge with the company famous for burying completed movies for a tax write-off?

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Regardless of what JK Rowling is Harry Potter is a international sensation. It’s insane that they’re trying to remake it when it’s what less than 20 years old.

        There’s plenty of good IP out there why don’t they make something of that.

        • popcar2@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          It’s not that insane considering the target audience are children and teenagers. People who are 14 years old now weren’t even born yet by the time Deathly Hallows part 2 came out, and I bet they’d rather watch a remake than their parent’s old DVDs.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Maybe, but the combination of backlash against Rowling herself with the fact that it’s being remade so soon, which may create a “this isn’t my Harry Potter” type effect, may mean this isn’t as successful as they’re hoping.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Such a cool timeline where the options are a consolidation merger that eliminates competition and creates an unfair advantage, destroying jobs, enriching the wealthy, or the same thing but with Larry Ellison who will obviously do it with a hard right wing slant (as opposed to the other option just quietly doing that)

  • finitebanjo@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Something me and Disney both agree on is this should be blocked.

    But the guy in charge of blocking this merger

    Is not going to block this merger.

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The only way this gets blocked is to steer it toward the Ellisons instead. Reasonable people can disagree, but to me, that’s even worse.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I mean, I get it but the only people bidding on WBD was Skydance (Ellison). The options were Skydance, Disney, a vulture fund, or Netflix. That’s probably why Netflix even decided to bid. Nobody wanted WBD.

    Consolidation should have never been allowed, but now that the beast that is Disney exists, there is very little argument that could succeed against the WBD purchase.

  • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I wonder if we will at least publicly name the folks who proposed this clearly illegal merger? Just for the record?