• resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Too dangerous to allow a liter of liquid on a plane.

    Let’s mix them all together in an airport where nothing bad can happen.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The liquids are not allowed because they mess with explosive detectors. Not because anyone thinks they are dangerous.

      It’s not “too dangerous to allow liquid on a plane”. It’s “we can’t detect explosives in your luggage if there are also liquids in it”.

      • Karjalan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        That doesn’t make sense. If that was the only reason, it would be easier and safer to just get people to take their liquid, in its container, out of the bag at scanning time

  • undeadotter@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    20 hours ago

    My dad worked at Gatwick Airport as a cleaner in the 70s when he was a teenager. His first week there, a woman drops a duty free bag with a bottle of booze in it and he rushes over to clean it up. He’s just about to put the bag, full of liquid booze and broken glass, in the bin when one of the senior porters stops him and tells him to bring it in the back. Turns out they had a filtration system in the break room for this exact scenario. They’d pour the booze out of the plastic bag and through a sieve that would collect all the broken glass, it would all go into a big container at the bottom and voila, free booze! They offered my dad some, but he declined. Anyway, I guess if you were working at Gatwick in the 70s you could have had a chance to drink some airport jungle juice, you’d just need to be brave enough.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      24 hours ago

      It also frustrates me how restaurants in international airports only follow the local “meal schedule.” If everyone were in the same timezone all day, then okay, I can see why you’d only offer breakfast before 10am. But that isn’t the case in an international airport. Why are all the dinner places closed? (Rhetorical question - I know the answer is “$$$”)

      But if you’ve been flying for hours, jetlagged from changing timezones, and you still need to catch a connecting flight, you may be ready for dinner/supper. It sucks when you want a more substantial meal, but the only options are eggy breakfast sandwiches and doughnuts.

      It just makes more sense to offer options for any time of day in a place that’s open 24 hours, where you know the people you intend to serve will be on different meal schedules from what the locals might follow.

      And that includes allowing people to buy/drink beer. But alas, those damn blue laws supersede all of that.

      • Evoliddaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        My little middle of nowhere airport will serve you before noon but damn you if you want a smoke or anything outside

    • boaratio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You should fly through the Milwaukee airport some time. It’s the only airport I’ve ever been to that just had beer carts everywhere, and you can just carry a beer with you throughout the entire airport. There are bins by each jetway where they make you throw your beer out before you can board. It’s wild.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Flying out of Madison recently I saw so many people bringing cases of Spotted Cow as their stowed carry-on. There’s a store right by the gate with a pile of cases for exactly this purpose of course

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      And then, being the law abiding citizen, I tried to relinquish my explosive fluids… Turns out they didn’t mean diarrhea. I think I made several lists that day, not sure which though.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I love the one time they didn’t like the hard drive expansion bay with vents in my laptop but decided it’s okay because it can’t be opened by hand but didn’t care about the screwdrivers in my carry-on bag that I forgot about which would allow me to access the expansion bay in flight if desired

      • JelleWho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I think k putting all the explosives together in one big container is a better idea than collecting Al the drugs

  • vrek@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Look… We don’t allow liquids cause they may be explosive, so put your possible explosive with all these other potential explosives in the busiest and most congested and concentrated area of this airport…i think I may of found a flaw in this plan

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The liquids are not allowed because they mess with explosive detectors. Not because anyone thinks they are dangerous.

      It’s not “we don’t allow liquids cause they may be explosive”. It’s “we don’t allow liquids cause if you have any in your luggage, we won’t be able to correctly detect explosives you might also have”.

      That’s why some airports now allow liquids. Newer scanners can detect explosives even in luggages that also contain liquids.

      Nobody thinks your bottle of water is dangerous. But your bottle of water will prevent the explosives detector from working.

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      1 day ago

      If there ever was proof the TSA is a clown show security theater it’s in this bin. Too bad it’s never going away because the average citizen simply doesn’t care and no administration wants to be responsible for making a bunch of poorly educated government employees lose their jobs.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        no administration wants to be responsible for making a bunch of poorly educated government employees lose their jobs

        DOGE?

      • FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well I wouldn’t say no administration is above the responsibility of making a bunch of government employees lose their jobs.

    • Saapas@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      24 hours ago

      But if that’s before the checks then you’d get that far just having a bomb under your jacket anyway. The liquid thing is to prevent you from blowing up planes and shit that comes after the check

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Presumably the liquid explosives aren’t going to explode when diluted with loads of water and energy drink

    • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I feel like their job is to stop people from blowing up terminals and planes. They literally can’t stop terrorism on the public side of the gate. They have no means.