• NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Organic Maps thinks that F-Droid has it in for them. (Untrue).

      F-Droid labels anti-features, properties of an app which are contrary to the philosophy of FOSS in some way. Organic Maps is labeled for two things:

      1. Promoting a proprietary hotels website called Kayak, by inserting links to it when looking at any hotel in the app. This is considered promotion of a non-free network. OM did not like being labeled with this anti-feature.
      2. Relying on Organic Maps’s servers for downloading maps, without giving the user the option to change the server URL. This is called Tethered Network Service.

      Tethered Network Service is a newly introduced anti-feature. This is besides the point, but before it was added, instances of this were labeled just “Non-Free Network Service”, which was ambiguous and caused a lot of confusion. The important thing is that it’s a new way to label apps.

      The F-Droid app has a filter that hides apps based on their anti-features. The filter lists various anti-features to select, and an “Other” category for everything not listed. The new TetheredNet is part of Other.

      Here’s the problem: the default filter used to hide apps with “Other” AFs. This default was changed some months ago, but only for new installations. Old installations, even if updated, will stick to whatever was the default when they were installed, therefore they will hide Organic Maps. Organic Maps made a big deal out of this, basically trying to shame F-Droid.

      According to the latest F-Droid news, this should be resolved already or soon. I don’t know what the solution is, but I have a couple of guesses.

      • InsertUser@en.osm.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        @NeatNit @gedaliyah @openstreetmap

        F-Droid do provide more detail about why they warn that something has an anti-feature, but only make that easily accessible if you run their code natively on your device. If you’re on the web interface you have to figure out which of the links in the external links section isn’t actually external and look in there.

        Their excuse for this is that their website can’t parse their own file format that they invented for themselves.

            • InsertUser@en.osm.town
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              @NeatNit @openstreetmap

              I would assume the same as the reason for warning about this in the first place? They don’t seem to like devs tying things back to preset websites and think it deserves a massive warning icon.

              • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                There is no option for a tiny warning icon, all AFs get the same treatment - this might be a bad design, but there’s no bad intentions behind it.

                This isn’t about what they like devs doing. It’s about informing users about how the app works and what it does.

                If they didn’t want Organic Maps on F-Droid, they’d just kick them off. There have been plenty of opportunities for them to do it and seem justified, i.e. “we are removing Organic Maps from F-Droid forever because its devs are constantly complaining, causing us extra work and drama in long fruitless discussions”. The opportunity to do that was explicit in the discussions and they didn’t take it.

                • InsertUser@en.osm.town
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  @NeatNit @openstreetmap
                  switching topics again are we?

                  They rolled out a massive new warning type and then didn’t have all their apps accept it as OK. That is a deliberate choice. It is their ecosystem from top to bottom, they *chose* not to have the TetheredNet added to the list of allowed warnings in existing installs. If they hadn’t wanted to make that choice they should have done the responsible thing and held the rollout until their app supported it.

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Thanks.

        I’ve never seen a kayak link. I can’t find an example or anything in the settings. Weird.

        Is TetheredNet for the same reason or because the app depends on OSM data? Would that apply to every OSM based app?

    • MechKit@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think that is why they shared the tutorial, since it is beyond what most people would attempt.