slothrop@lemmy.ca to The Shitpost Office@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 day agoA Pile of Inspirationlemmy.caimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1159
arrow-up1159imageA Pile of Inspirationlemmy.caslothrop@lemmy.ca to The Shitpost Office@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·22 hours ago7 inches diameter, radius, or circumference? We need more information, for reasons…
minus-squarePulptastic@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 hours agoMy first assumption was diameter but then thinking about how this is tested I bet it is width, so half circumference. That means D=4.45” so just over one raccoon, maybe one raccoon and a trinket it found and won’t let go.
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·19 hours agoI feel like they are probably just guesstimating by using goatse as a source, so diameter?
minus-squarelauha@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·20 hours agoAny normal person would assume diameter and no-one outside of mathematics would assume radius in this context.
minus-squarecassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 hours agoI’ve spent some time in dungeons. I might assume radius.
7 inches diameter, radius, or circumference?
We need more information, for reasons…
My first assumption was diameter but then thinking about how this is tested I bet it is width, so half circumference.
That means D=4.45” so just over one raccoon, maybe one raccoon and a trinket it found and won’t let go.
I feel like they are probably just guesstimating by using goatse as a source, so diameter?
Any normal person would assume diameter and no-one outside of mathematics would assume radius in this context.
I’ve spent some time in dungeons. I might assume radius.