• realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not really about working harder. Before, it just wasn’t a justifiable expense investing time into ensuring proton support or even linux support because a sub 1% OS just isn’t “worth” supporting from a financial standpoint. That changed with the steamdeck and because the steamdeck is actually just a small PC with built-in controller, things that profit the deck also profit the linux ecosystem.

    Honestly the steam deck was a genius move from valve.

    • Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      2 days ago

      Devs targeting Steam Deck Verified sets a bar for performance that ends up including other PCs with integrated graphics or those with older graphics cards (up to ~10 years)

      By extended the usable life of older gaming hardware, It’s even a win from an environmental point of view.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I’m willing to bet that without the Deck, most AAA games would have already jumped to requiring roughly PS5-level PC hardware now that last gen consoles are effectively dead.
        UE5 on the Deck might not be pretty, but making it run at all on it lowers the minimum requirements of a game tremendously.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      because the steamdeck is actually just a small PC

      That is very contrary to what’s the point of the article. Supporting the Steam deck also means supporting the controller and the small screen format. Things that can benefit users of Windows based handhelds too.