• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Er, why would you expect the software on this to be any more restricted than the Deck’s? Have you seen some information to that effect?

    • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      No, I just don’t trust Valve. They poached the better Cassali off Doomworld, and they’ve monopolized gaming without physical media.

      TBH, if Tim, Romero, or Carmack relaunched the Big Blue Disk, I would get in, in a heartbeat.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Well, OK, let me ask this a different way then…

        How could they possibly distribute a device that was end-user ready with any less control?

        They went out of their way to make the Deck user-repairable and partnered with iFixIt to make replacement parts and documentation easily available. They built in a simple way to switch to the Arch desktop so the user could easily access non-Steam applications or take control of the OS if desired. I don’t see how the device could be more open to end-user control and still ready-to-use out of the box.

      • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Valve does not have a monopoly by any definition of the word, especially the legal definition. They don’t have a majority of the business because they buy out the competition or use their position to drop prices to a level that others can’t compete with. They have a majority of the market because they provide a better service than the competition and have been doing it long enough to have developed a cultural gravity in the same way that Xbox, PlayStation, and Facebook and Twitter have.