• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I pretty much only use YouTube to look up specific clips of things (eg: simpsons clips, bits from movies), the very occasional video game “how do I do this specific thing?”, and specific songs i don’t have a copy of. I never watch any of its original content. I’m sure some of it is fine, but sturgeon’s law says most of it is crap, and there’s so much non-crap already on my radar to read/watch/listen to.

    So fuck youtube.

      • k0e3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah, fuck YouTube as a platform, but to dismiss the entire content seems a bit whack. But I guess if they’re already happy with whatever it is that they’re watching, it’s OK, I guess.

  • solomonschuler@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Is it wrong or accurate to think that after the word “locate” was used I was immediately thinking of “locate your location.” 😂

    Its strange that they use the word “locate” than “select” or something along those lines.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    “This will allow YouTube to locate the best content.”

    It’s the blatant bald-faced lying that really gets me. They’re openly broadcasting how little respect they have for you, that they think you’ll swallow that as a valid reason not to function.

    It’s as if some manager at Google deep down knows he’s a piece of shit who belongs in a gulag, and is subconsciously trying to bring it about.

  • Camille_Jamal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    That’s absolute bullshit youtube, they don’t need any locational stuff, other than to sell to advertisers.

    .>:(

  • eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I don’t use proprietary, known evil services which require me to authenticate.

  • leastaction@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Enshittification proceeding nicely. I use Freetube on the desktop and Newpipe on my Android phone. I have ExpressVPN on my router.

  • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    Change the VPN server/location.

    That’s why VPNs give you hundreds of options. You should be changing your VPN location anyway based on the pseudo-profile you want. VPNs aren’t magic, they’re just tools.

    Other options include:

    Searching for the video with DDG or Startpage and playing the video via their search

    Using an Invidious frontend

    • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s such an easier fix: just stop using a service that has zero respect for you.

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have this set up on my router. My wifi is blanket tunneled through a VPN. For annoying sites that restrict access like reddit, my router routes through a specific VPN server that doesn’t (yet) get blocked (I don’t post/comment/browse, but occasionally find a post that answers a question). That way it works on my whole home network, regardless of device.

      Same could be done for YouTube presumably, but maybe a little more complicated (reddit seems to work with a single /32 address).

      Plus, it’s fun to set up—MikroTik router, Mullvad, and an ARM SBC doing the VPN duties for me, but myriad ways to get it working for other configurations.

      • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        24 hours ago

        For reading reddit you can just use a redlib frontend and never get blocked. When I get the “woah there, pardner!” I just take the URL from the /r/ onward and paste it after a frontend URL. Takes 2 seconds.

        Also, setting up a router level VPN is just an OpenWRT config on plenty of routers. Depends on your firmware how many servers you can have listed to bounce between. Otherwise just bounce more per device.

        • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Yeah, one of the issues I was having with running VPN on router is that you need a somewhat beefy router if you want to use your full bandwidth—my router maxes out at about 90Mbps with WireGuard, even though it can NAT around 1Gbps (which is our service).

          I implemented two workarounds, one was to use my access point as a VPN router since it had a beefier CPU, and the other was to just use an ARM SBC with Linux to handle that task. (I ended up with the latter, as the former ended up maxing out at around 400Mbps, and introduced some additional headaches.)

      • PolarKraken@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m doing a crude version of this with a Flint 2 router and Mullvad. Don’t enjoy fiddling with my network (and upstream is unreliable for now, making troubleshooting an irritating game of crossing off doubts each time I have issues, rather than learning things better).

        At the moment I just have a guest Wifi that doesn’t get VPN’ed for things like Roku devices and such (slowly migrating the home away from stuff like this).

        I appreciate the always-on “blanket” traffic tunneling, a lot. But I’d like a more flexible setup - things like allowing access to Jellyfin from guest Wifi (or similar), site-specific exclusions or other workarounds for when I need to reach a banking site that has predictable VPN complaints, etc.

        Not a fan of just playing house-wide VPN exit whack-a-mole each time myself or someone else experiences an issue, but maybe that’s part of the game.

        Know of any good starting points for the flexibility I’m describing? Probably just need to learn LuCI and firewall and VLAN principles?

        • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I also have an SSID that doesn’t get VPN’d, though my DNS is always VPN’d.

          As for accessing JellyFin, etc., I think we have somewhat different setups. My self hosted services are by default accessible without a VPN (SSID is on a VLAN with e.g. 192.168.0.0/24, servers are on 192.168.1.0/24, router routes between them). For the blanket VPN’d SSID I have a routing rule that routes over the main, not VPN, table, so local services can be accessed.

          So: local traffic has a rule to route without VPN, reddit routes with a specific VPN, and general traffic routes with a different VPN.

          There are lots of VLANs involved in my setup, and I’m sure it’s overly complicated and has gaping security issues, but it’s just a home network and it’s kinda fun :(

  • DSN9@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Which country gave you this prompt?

    I’m trying to say give up YT, not worth it anymore.

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    lol…. YouTube will never be okay with VPNs. Yet everyone thinks they’re clever trying to work around it with this shit- while never really accepting that you’re supporting a service that treats its users and content creators like they’re complete and total idiots.

    STOP USING YOUTUBE.

    problem solved.

    • 4grams@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I intend on continuing to use it as long as I can with my adblockers, noscript extensions, pinhole and so forth in place. I will keep up the game as long as it can be played, and when I lose, I’ll walk away.

      I cannot tolerate the enshittification cycle. I’m happy to pay for services, I’m not happy being frogboiled into having to pay for them.

      • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Cool! Have fun obnoxiously complaining about it to the eco chamber of fellow Stockholm syndrome sufferers.

  • bonenode@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    The very, very best content. Content so beautiful it makes you go “hmmm, what beautiful content”. Can’t serve no wonderful content with that nasty VPN on, no sir.