• nailingjello@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Text for the lazy.

    Duverger’s Law

    In political science, Duverger’s law holds that single-ballot plurality-rule elections (such as first past the post) structured within single-member districts tend to favor a two-party system.

    Duverger’s law is the reason why U.S. voters select one of the two leading candidates when voting tactically, even if a third-party candidate would better represent their interests. This behavior arises out to fear of vote splitting

    One consequence of Duverger’s law is that you can improve the viability of third-party candidates by changing the voting system. For example, Approval voting is more resistant to vote splitting and therefore more conducive to third-party candidates.

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The problem is that many people see the system ending up with “vote blue AND the fascists get their way”. It ends up being totally discouraging.

        • gustofwind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I understand being discouraged that Blue doesn’t deliver

          But I don’t understand how that matters when Red is openly promising death and destruction

          Red only wins elections when Blue voters stay home so we could always at least stop Red

          • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            The thing is, what’s your preference? Disappointment on a regular basis, or transparent hate and naked greed? Destruction can only last so long, but a slow slide into depression can last forever. Voting Red often ends up being the accelerationist choice as much as support for their vile beliefs.

            • gustofwind@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Oh no 🥲 besides being wholly divorced from reality you also think there’s a brighter future on the other side of accelerationist collapse

              Politics has simply become an unserious affair

              • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I’m not exactly set on “brighter”, but at least it will be “different”. Right now, I feel like something has to give. Voting alone won’t get us out of the hole we’ve been buried in. Trusting the same people who lied and brought us to this point won’t get us to a better place. I’m really not against a different path that makes push come to shove anymore, is all.

  • tyler@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    STAR or 3-2-1 voting are both much much better options than Approval Voting. Please advocate for one of those two rather than Approval or RCV. Yes, Approval is much better than RCV, but we’re only going to get one chance to change voting systems. If it goes wrong locales will switch back and never try again.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Cool, now I can really strut my stuff. Whenever someone comments “first past the post is bad” or “2-party systems suck” I can reply “Duverger’s law!”