• Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Lol, I always love it when people have to split hairs so finely on definitions that they risk fission.

    I made this joke elsewhere, but this is basically the No True Memesmen fallacy. The definition of meme includes these pictures, and trying to narrow the definition to exclude them is laughable.

    • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      When everything is a meme, nothing is. Ther is no adaptation, no cultural twist, no recontextualisation or any other relevant criteria in a screenshot of text and nothing else.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Ok, so just make up your own word that has the definition you want, or deal with your definition not being the same as others’. Because the definition of meme isn’t as specific as you want it to be.

        I see this as no different than the people who argued that image macros aren’t memes.

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Because the definition of meme

          The Oxford Dictionary’s definition of a meme you meant to say.

          For example, Jana Zündel (german article), a german meme researcher, stated that a meme always includes a recontextualisation. The Wiki page lists key characteristics such as intertextuality and cultural evolution.

          There is a screenshot from reddit posted here earlier today, do you think that’s a meme? Can you take it, put it in a new context and have it keep its original context as a reference so that the new post would create a new idea building on the context? Or is it just a random story, maybe funny to some?