irelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 days agoit's just human naturelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square167fedilinkarrow-up11.17K
arrow-up11.17Kimageit's just human naturelemmy.dbzer0.comirelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square167fedilink
minus-squareMNByChoice@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days ago they had no way of knowing who was using what I think u/MyMindIsLikeAnOcean’s point was that the landlord would change things if the cost got high enough. For example, water usage of $10K per month would prompt the landlord to get those meters added.
minus-squarezalgotext@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days ago For example, water usage of $10K per month would prompt the landlord to get those meters added. Our more likely, raise everyone’s rent to cover the excessive water use.
minus-squareMNByChoice@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 hours agoI have heard of both happening. At some point though, an individual building’s rent can only go so high.
I think u/MyMindIsLikeAnOcean’s point was that the landlord would change things if the cost got high enough. For example, water usage of $10K per month would prompt the landlord to get those meters added.
Our more likely, raise everyone’s rent to cover the excessive water use.
I have heard of both happening. At some point though, an individual building’s rent can only go so high.