A lot of film critique industry is based upon fart-sniffing snobbery.
It’s like a game of one-upsmanship on how much “meaning” you can invent derive from dull, self-important drudgery and the more masochistic your movie-watching experience, the more “refined” you are.
Source: had to study media crit and industry a lot in school.
A lot of film critique industry is based upon fart-sniffing snobbery.
It’s like a game of one-upsmanship on how much “meaning” you can
inventderive from dull, self-important drudgery and the more masochistic your movie-watching experience, the more “refined” you are.Source: had to study media crit and industry a lot in school.
It’s like the
modern art
money laundering
Industry…but at 25 frames per second!
(Or some arbitrary frame rate to stir further controversy)
I prefer art to run at 60 FPS.
That’s the stuff, 144 if I can get away with it! 😜
Maybe not for films tho hahaha
you can really taste the extra perseconds
you can’t just say perseconds
Pretty sure they just did.
I can’t remember the name of the film but there is one film released relatively recently that’s just a series of photographs. Set to music.
It’s literally slower than one frame per second.
Is it a Terrence Malick film?
Respectfully of course, that sounds quite literally like it’s a really long slideshow? 🤔
but what if i like the way quentin tarantinos ass fart? what therefore then?
foot
you make an adulterously valid point