• Riverside@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    “Communism is worker council power plus the electrification of the whole country”

    -Vladimir Lenin

    Hydroelectric power as a premise to industrialization was one of the core pillars of Soviet socialism, you are 100 years late. Also, 93% of solar photovoltaic modules are manufactured in the People’s Republic of China.

    • Dippy@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      And I would have gotten away with it if it wasnt for you meddling commies! Good work comrade

      • Riverside@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Well, energy has always been important policy, and I happen to be a STEM edgelord who knows his stuff

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, solar panels are the (a) means of energy production, so in that sense I don’t see where any communist theorists would disagree. But please draw me the line from everyone having solar panels to “revolution” without any other Marxist theory.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago
      1. the people set up local solar collection grids
      2. the state gets mad as the state ultimately represents the interests of the petrochemical industry (the state is almost universally a petrostate)
      3. the state implements a system of taxes and subsidies to reduce the economic efficacy of solar panels
      4. when enough people maintain their solar panels, the state resorts to its usual mechanism for enforcement: violence
      5. the people, confronted with the violence of the state must either submit to the power of the state or respond to the violence of the state with violence of their own

      idk if i succeeded or failed

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not sure what to make of your assertion of the state as universally a petrostate. And you haven’t touched on the means of solar panel production, let alone any other necessities or commodities (just a mention of maintenance).

    • Dippy@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Oh I mean like Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, etc. The list is long and contentious. Take your pick, theres no wrong answers for my purposes here.

      Edit: let’s play a fun game, reply with who i left out. I bet I left your favorite out.

      • Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lenin, Stalin, Mao I get. Marx? Lenin Stalin and Mao like to use his name while rejecting his philosophy. So it seems odd to lump him with them. But then I suppose it’s been a common thing in many western countries forever.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Can you elaborate on how Marxist-Leninists “use Marx’s name while rejecting his philosophy?” Lenin’s major advances on Marxism include analyzing imperialism as a higher stage of capitalism, something Marx lived to see only the very beginnings of, as well as organizational theory. Lenin represented a return to Marx, considering the Second International had at that point vulgarized Marx into a reformist. What part of Marxism does Marxism-Leninism reject? You specifically mention philosophy, but Marxism-Leninism affirms dialectical materialism, so I assume you mean something else.

          Further, Marxism-Leninism is largely an ideology practiced in the global south, not so much the global north. Perhaps I’m misreading you, but you make it seem as though it’s largely western, and that this is why it “rejects” Marx. More common in the west are Trotskyists, who still uphold Lenin, or Eurocomms, who also uphold Lenin. The number of Marxists that reject Lenin, even if they disagree with AES countries, is extremely small, period, global north or south.

          • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Hey dude I just have to say that even though I’m more sympathetic to anarchosynicalist thought one of the high points of lemmy for me atm is popping into threads and seeing you (extremely charitably) demolish people who clearly haven’t ever engaged with much literature but have strong opinons on it.

            Cheers, people like you help us all hone our thoughts.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Thanks, I appreciate it! I genuinely am not trying to demolish anyone, though, I’d prefer if people could cooperatively build knowledge together. The idea of “debate” is so thoroughly ingrained in English-speaking spaces, but it isn’t actually a very effective tool for learning, on either side. That’s more the reason I’m charitable, I’d rather not have a debate, to be honest, even if that’s what I used to do a lot of back in my more lib Reddit days.

        • Dippy@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh nice try but you did not add any new names to the list, no points to you

  • jode@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    And I’ll tell you what used solar panels and inverters are cheap as shit on marketplace. Batteries are getting there too.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Man if I had a field it would be littered with cheap secondhand solar panels. Where I live I can maybe get a balcony one

    • Postimo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      What’s not captured by the picture is that these panels are stolen from the mobile police cameras they roll around.

    • Dippy@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Dismantling the oil industry is revolutionary. And it will improve nearly every facet of life across the globe while be a goal that is achievable and happening right now.

      • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Damn, critical support to Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Tesla, Google and Apple then for promoting and sometimes manufacturing home solar solutions. Truly the most revolutionary of companies!

        • Dippy@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          Woah that’s quite the jump. A very strange jump at that. Who said I liked any of those companies?

          • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Look, I get that you’re quite young and probably still trying to understand how the world works, but your revolutionary idea is what these companies have more or less been pushing themselves. I could make a few walls of text for sure on why this is dumb, but just look up what greenwashing is, fossil fuel industry campaigns of advertising solar power and their solutions, and how the concept of individual action to bring about change is just garbage that has been actively spouted and weaponized by corporations (e.g. the anti-pollution craze where to solve climate change and widespread pollution crisis was to just “recycle more” and “drive cars less” while they kept polluting at industrial scale).

            • Dippy@beehaw.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              2 days ago

              Oh… your seriously like that? Um, good luck out there. Hope things get better for you! In the mean time, im going to be pushing for developing countries to skip over the step where the are ever dependant upon fossil fuels to improve their standard of living. That way, oil super powers lose incredible amounts of influence over the globe, especially the most vulnerable peoples. (Side note: also reducing global temperature by transforming the sunlight into energy instead of heat) if hope is of interest to you, come along, id love to have you journey with me.