• Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    yes but why choose a celebrity that knows politics when you could have someone with a full education and career (or at least you could wish for one)

    • rylock@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Because it’s a popularity contest where name recognition is a huge factor. I swear it’s like some people want to lose.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        My original point is that the very American celebrity worship phenomenon, which has turned your entire government in a popularity contest, is BAD for you… so maybe don’t keep going down this route?

        I swear some people find themselves in a hole and they just want to keep digging

        • rylock@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Elections have always been popularity contests, what are you even talking about? It’s about finding a prominent figure that has a strong, and hopefully benign, vision for the country and to raise that person as a figurehead.

          That they come from pop culture in the US now is just a reflection of the collapse of their civic space. You still need to find a viable path to victory, and wishing we were in a different era will only prevent adaptation to the new reality.

            • ChokingHazard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              You’re awfully loud to be this wrong. Look at Ukraine, Slovenia, Pakistan, Uganda, Guatemala and more. All of these places have elected celebrities and or comedians to high political office. It is not strictly an American thing.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I don’t understand your replies. In the video Jon addresses the impulse people have to want folk like him, Colbert, and Kimmel to run for office. He insinuates his disagreement but understands the sentiment. In other words, exactly your point.

      On the other hand, you keep arguing the point of Jon as POTUS in this comment thread when the only point being made was that, unlike most celebrities, Jon has knowledge and experience in the legislative process. You stated that he had no other qualification other than fame. I corrected that misconception. Nothing more.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I don’t understand your replies. In the video Jon addresses the impulse people have to want folk like him, Colbert, and Kimmel to run for office. He insinuates his disagreement but understands the sentiment. In other words, exactly your point.

        yet ITT everybody is already voting for this imaginary ticket

        On the other hand, you keep arguing the point of Jon as POTUS in this comment thread when the only point being made was that, unlike most celebrities, Jon has knowledge and experience in the legislative process. You stated that he had no other qualification other than fame. I corrected that misconception. Nothing more.

        read the comments… the celebrity worship is out of control here

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I get that, for the overall post. I was just noting that this specific comment thread was in response to your comment about his qualifications and experience. Nothing more. It later got filled with other trains of conversation, but my response to you was specific to that one subject, not whether or not celebrities in general should be public servants.