• dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    They didnt have a choice, they were sold a lie. It’s absolutely not chattel slavery, but neither is prison slavery but its all still slavery. I agree it is not chattel slavery.

    Kenneth Copeland demanding you to volunteer for his benefit while he feeds and clothes you is slavery still, but the pharoah had an army and the priests on his side to subjugate everyone and literally designed around you whipping your own back so the gods wouldnt be upset at you for the bad harvest this season. All punishment was divine and good. Its slavery my friend.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      its all still slavery

      TIL all social systems through all history are slavery.

      I get what you’re trying to say but it’s not a smart principled argument. We don’t know the cultural attitudes and alternatives they had 4000 years ago, so let’s do what actual educated people and researchers do which is say “we don’t know.” Unless you’re advocating for an end to society broadly, that would certainly take care of the issue of people manipulating others to work in any capacity.

      Otherwise it’s kind of dumbing-down and oversimplifying “slavery” which kind of harms modern anti-slavery efforts.

      • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I firmly believe that every single bronze age civilization was no less morally apprehensive than what we have today with capitalism and wage slavery. Ancient egypt is no better—the pharoahs were slavers who had a happy set of cattle at their disposal as far as im concerned, just like employers do today in capitalist nations.

        If you are employed and love your employer for giving you everything you need and no worries, live that life my friend, but you would be a slave. Egyptians didn’t have that choice tho

        • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          21 hours ago

          you’re stretching the term “slavery” beyond what is acceptable in the context of historical discussion.

          The inequality is one of the core principles of society. And even if the society was magically equal, your freedom would end where other’s freedom would start.

          Your definition of slavery is also quite useless simply due to the fact that everyone is a slave by your logic, as everyone has some kind of social obligation they are ought to fullfill, be it for the money or otherwise.

          Egyptians didn’t have that choice tho

          Do we tho? Not having to work is a privilege. Without a job you’ll most likely die a slow miserable death if you don’t have that privilege, as we no longer raise our food, collect our drinking water, or build our own houses. Not to mention, we still have to pay taxes.

          By the way, according to what i heard, working on a pyramid construction was exactly the last case — a form of tax payment.

          Anyway, considering that workers were well fed, receiving meat, beer and bread in greater quantities than any peasant of the day would dream of, as well as they had medical care for their conscription period, one might hypothesize that most people of the time would’ve jumped on an opportunity like that.

          Your argument is neither constructive, nor it helps to represent reality better, let alone do so historically correct.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Thank you for this, this is a much better way of outlining what bothers me about the weird pyramid-builder’s rights movement that seems to always crop up in these posts.

            You can make great arguments for better social welfare and support systems in today’s world without trying to drag invented-ghosts out of the deep-past from ages that are so far removed from modern values and standards that it may as well be another planet.

            I guess the Pharaohs actually did achieve some form of immortality if those giant stacks of rock get people on the internet 4000 years to confront their own poorly-framed social arguments.

            • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Thanks! I’m not used to hear any kind of appraisal, especially online, so i will admit, i do feel a bit awkward right now :D

              I guess the Pharaohs actually did achieve some form of immortality…

              Well, AFAIR, they did believe that as long as their name was spoken, they continued to live in the afterlife, didn’t they? They definitely were onto something

            • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              happens with the best of us. If anything, ability to change one’s opinion instead of blindly insisting on it is always an admirable quality. Vocalizing such fact takes an even greater resolve.

              No matter how firm your belief was, you have my respect.

              • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 hours ago

                I’ll remain highly suspicious but if its just a tax payment system that isn’t the worst thing ever. I am always more than happy to be wrong if presented with evidence

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Egyptians didn’t have that choice tho

          We. Don’t. Know.

          I don’t disagree with your ideas abstractly and broadly but I am more focused on material outcomes and the current world, and my knowledge of history and pre-history is enough to know that I don’t know a lot, which means others probably know even less, so I reject deep-history societal comparisons for any purpose other than curiosity and scientific interest.

          • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            Humans have historically been slavers as leaders. I demand the necessary incredible evidence to believe the pharoahs were truly benevolent. I am okay with us not knowing for certain if they were horrible god-emperor slaver tyrants or just your run of the mill god-emperor slaver tyrants, but I demand the necessary evidence that they werent slaver tyrants. Humans are humans, no matter the time period, and human leaders are slavers historically

            • ameancow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              I demand an incredible evidence to believe the pharoahs were truly benevolent

              Who’s saying that?

              When did normal discourse become this binary and un-nuanced?

              • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                I require more evidence than we currently have to believe the pharoahs werent slavers is all. I firmly believe those farmers were enslaved, and equally those that built the pyramids were enslaved as well. I dont see any reason to believe they had anything we would consider today not slavery.

                I woll grant you they might not thought of themselves as slaves, but employed people today with student debt or mortgages dont think theyre slaves either, but I firmly disagree as well on that front.

                My definition of slavery is a big tent. We already have terms like chattel slavery to describe the specific kind of slavery that happened in the colonial period that continues to this day and still enslaves people in places around the world away from western eyes

                • ameancow@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  It’s a little late in the game to advocate for the rights of the pyramid builders. But you do you.

                  • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    22 hours ago

                    Im only looking back and history and seeing enslavement happening is all, just like people in the future will hopefully look back on today and be like “wow all those americans were enslaved and didn’t even know it!” ya know? No doubt in my mind that the pharoahs wanted to make slavery look appealing as possible, all good employers incentivize hard work ethic, comraderie, overtime etc. Still enslavement imo if youre the bottom rung (the labor forcr)