• boaratio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Sure, but as the CEO of one of the most valuable companies in the world, shouldn’t he think about how bad the optics of this are?

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        This feels like similar energy to getting outraged about a tan suit.

        Were all involved parties consenting? That’s the only thing that matters.

        Plus on the optics side, we’ve yet to see if being in the Epstein files is bad enough optics for CEOs, so I think “signed something on an adult woman’s boobs when she most likely specifically requested/offered it” is entirely a non-issue.

      • IronBird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        literally the coolest thing he’s done

        should sign more tits instead of begging people to stop complaining about AI, maybe stonk price would go up more

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Hm gotta be honest, I don’t give a shit about optics, especially since that asshole is plenty bad regardless.