• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    building nuclear takes decades

    regulatory: 3-5 years

    site prep and build: 3-5 years

    stocking, staffing, startup: 1-2 years

    If we rush the regulatory, it’s then 4-7 years; or not even one decade.

    I’m not saying it’s overnight, but it’s not ‘decades’.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      SMRs take a few years, and a fraction of the price, which is why China is building them and already has one on line.

    • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Where’s a real world example of a nuclear plant being built in just 4 years? In the US it’s more like 10 years, at least.

      No one’s building them because they’re barely profitable even after they’re up and running for many years.

    • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Rushing regulatory for a construction project where failures are as severe as they can potentially be with nuclear is beyond deranged.

      Getting to the timelines you’re mentioning would require a mature nuclear industry with standardized builds, something which would take more than a decade to develop, at a steep premium.

      Again, I support any investor willing to go there to do so, but there’s a good reason none do - these things quite simply do not pencil out.