cplusplus@programming.dev to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-212 days agoWhy Veracrypt not in flatpak?message-squaremessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up17
arrow-up17message-squareWhy Veracrypt not in flatpak?cplusplus@programming.dev to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-212 days agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareReversalHatchery@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 days agoand then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? that it can be used with older dependencies? if so, is that a good thing to have for things that modify system startup?
minus-squareJustMarkov@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·13 days ago and then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? Flatpaks is a universal package format, it works almost everywhere. Also, there are immutable distros, that use flatpak as the default package format.
and then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? that it can be used with older dependencies? if so, is that a good thing to have for things that modify system startup?
Flatpaks is a universal package format, it works almost everywhere. Also, there are immutable distros, that use flatpak as the default package format.