No, you’re just making things convoluted in your own head.
Otherwise this sound like a comment aimed at something completely different.
Once again, that’s a you problem.
The reality is that I made a declaration that I don’t buy slop, you challenged that and implied that I probably have. I then asked you to state which slop-inclusive games I’ve purchased (or any games since TotK), and then you failed to do so.
Everything following that is you redirecting away from the fact that you ran your mouth with “I bet you bought more slop games then (sic) you’d like to admit.”, but cannot name one slop game that i have purchased.
Tl;dr: you wrote a check with your mouth that your ass can’t cash.
So are you seriously saying you didn’t get my sentence as an implication that I doubt your ability to detect AI has been used in a game you bought previously?
I mean this was my original reply and you went into some kind of defense for me not knowing what you bought or will buy. No shit Sherlock.
So are you seriously saying you didn’t get my sentence as an implication that I doubt your ability to detect AI has been used in a game you bought previously?
You don’t get to pivot.
I said I won’t buy slop. You said oh bullshit you’ve probably bought some without even knowing/how could you tell, implying that I am talking out of my ass.
Produce the evidence that I have purchased some slop, or shut your fucking yip yap.
I mean this was my original reply and you went into some kind of defense for me not knowing what you bought or will buy. No shit Sherlock.
Your defense was to back down from your original accusation, and and attempt to shift the conversation away from that which you couldn’t substantiate.
Might I suggest that you just sit the fuck down, as you’re too far behind to salvage your initial turd of a comment?
This is entirely a you problem.
No, you’re just making things convoluted in your own head.
Once again, that’s a you problem.
The reality is that I made a declaration that I don’t buy slop, you challenged that and implied that I probably have. I then asked you to state which slop-inclusive games I’ve purchased (or any games since TotK), and then you failed to do so.
Everything following that is you redirecting away from the fact that you ran your mouth with “I bet you bought more slop games then (sic) you’d like to admit.”, but cannot name one slop game that i have purchased.
Tl;dr: you wrote a check with your mouth that your ass can’t cash.
So are you seriously saying you didn’t get my sentence as an implication that I doubt your ability to detect AI has been used in a game you bought previously?
I mean this was my original reply and you went into some kind of defense for me not knowing what you bought or will buy. No shit Sherlock.
You don’t get to pivot.
I said I won’t buy slop. You said oh bullshit you’ve probably bought some without even knowing/how could you tell, implying that I am talking out of my ass.
Produce the evidence that I have purchased some slop, or shut your fucking yip yap.
Your defense was to back down from your original accusation, and and attempt to shift the conversation away from that which you couldn’t substantiate.
Might I suggest that you just sit the fuck down, as you’re too far behind to salvage your initial turd of a comment?