• ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    11 hours ago

    ‘Levantine’ would have been a more accurate term. The ‘Canaanite’ term is specifically what’s used to differentiate from ‘Hebrews’ in zionism, both before and after Israel was created. Biblically Canaanites are Phoenecians, which are one of many Levantine tribes and city states of the Bronze and Biblical eras.

    • napoleonsdumbcousin@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 hours ago

      AFAIK it is common practice to call them Canaanites:

      Thus, while “Phoenician” and “Canaanite” refer to the same culture, archaeologists and historians commonly refer to the Bronce Age pre-1200 BC Levantine peoples as Canaanites, while their Iron Age descendants, particularly those living on the coast, are referred to as Phoenicians.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canaan

          • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            It’s a broader term that is no less accurate. But it is also one more removed from political connotations since this is not just about using the term ‘Canaanite’ as it is also changing it from ‘Palestinian.’

            Changing ‘Palestinian’ to ‘Canaanite’ in 2026 specifically means something more given the Israelite-Canaanite context.

            It’s either malicious or stupid, and evidence is tending to the former for the group that sought the change and the latter for the museum.