DHS is expanding its use of administrative subpoenas, which don't come from judges.
  • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    5·
    3 hours ago

    I sure do hope that once anti-ICE users catch a wind of this, they’d move to lemmy, Signal and selfhosted platforms ASAP.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      2·
      55 minutes ago

      Lemmy is by no means private or secure, and depending on your level of op-sec you are easily identifiable.

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.worldEnglish
    12·
    7 hours ago

    Users on those centralized platforms got exactly what they deserved. The writing on the wall was yelled at them for years and still ignored.

    • escapeVelocity@lemmy.caEnglish
      2·
      5 hours ago

      Idk. If it was in their TOS yes they agreed to it. But if the company sait it would only give info if requested by a warrant and they given it without any consideration. They can be sued .

      • Septimaeus@infosec.pubEnglish
        1·
        1 hour ago

        I suspect the user above you doesn’t care about that technicality. They’re just blaming victims for not being as virtuous as we are, which is small.

    • Voytrekk@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      4·
      5 hours ago

      Ya, I’m not sure why they are not included in the title when they are talked about in the article too. These massive tech companies cannot be trusted with your data to any degree.

      • illi@piefed.socialEnglish
        1·
        4 hours ago

        Likely because Discord is not as widely known - and it’d make the title longer.

    • dan@upvote.auEnglish
      1·
      4 hours ago

      Discord doesn’t get as many clicks compared to the larger companies, since fewer people know about it. For articles like this, news publishers always list the most well-known brands.