Direct link to the funding campaign to help accelerate the development of Discord-like features, such as servers with rooms/spaces, as well as drop-in voice channels.
It’s quite an impressive little app capable of:
- Excellent text chats with file upload support, including solid optional encryption (OMEMO, based on Signal’s encryption but modified to be compatible with federation)
- Group voice/video calls with screensharing (just implemented, must use a chromium based browser to screenshare an app’s audio at the moment)
- A neat integrated blogging feature for communities & individuals
- a fun built-in paint program to easily annotate documents or draw stuff into the chat
- Full working and proven federation thanks to the XMPP back-end, which allows it to scale up reliably and easily self-host (XMPP is very lightweight).
- Uses the AGPL license, ensuring that corpos won’t be able to take it over. It’ll be community-owned forever.
In message-mode, it looks fairly similar to Discord:

The dev also posted a preview of what the new spaces feature looks like in the development branch:

Unlike Signal, Movim doesn’t require a phone number email to create an account. And since it runs right in the browser, it’s extremely quick to sign up and give it a test to see if it can meet your needs.
And if a Discord-alternative built on a truly open and federated protocol is something you want, consider throwing the dev a donation, or contributing with code (if you have the skills and time) or helping improve the documentation! :D
To stay updated on its progress, the !xmpp@slrpnk.net community pretty reliably posts news about it.


And it also made it easier to have a captive audience, because when you have a kitchen sink app, any potential competitor has to build an entire house to support their in-house solution. So it makes harder to escape corporate jails, and honestly it’s not something that we should be promoting.
That comment was not a promotion of Discord, but a realistic assessment of its capabilities. Those same capabilities are being implemented in Movim (which I am promoting), which is FLOSS, and built on open standards from 1999 that would make an outside corporate takeover very difficult.
Unless you mean that even full-featured FLOSS software that’s difficult to re-create are equally capable of creating a captive audience/walled garden and should be avoided? In which case, wouldn’t that include things like GIMP, Krita, or even the Linux kernel itself?
So you’re saying people shouldn’t want nice features?
Not really, more like they shouldn’t want them all in the same place / under the same provider. Don’t put all the eggs in the same basket in this digital day and age and all that.